X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=Wk+RMun+aKWtuwqvpeE1d3vklq5hXf/OQJ+1shWfm2w=;
	b=A023O+swbvpQjnZFjBKBxgjj59/dcOTvqhoz9tWG31KxubvPikWkInetXu1GIQrZOT
	xrBsMa6T7gWNRYNLqkarBKEdvBhXQs4TCUtuTY8lu/regjhREWsnbnHlEdjIRhLum08n
	/dSQUttlOybjeUdXlwEcqDjZh1CBa3Md0EDTQF/RhRBsdSDbXnH4jHgsScsQsHuRyUnl
	TysbA/LVRkikpatc96OVflUu61ERLaapa/MVsbldR4Lfv+ZnGXSJYq3ubLNAZYyS/nO+
	zKOVo1XFaUvvidT/trqv2rXrdhDOWzTo+A4s/nldMU8Mo51//TjGUNMoiN4CbWW/T76b
	ipLA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.182.232.225 with SMTP id tr1mr8975068obc.69.1372575746998;
	Sun, 30 Jun 2013 00:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20130630114524.02f33168@warrawoona.sti>
References:	<20130630045911 DOT 22b7bbe8 AT warrawoona DOT sti>
	<51CFA140 DOT 3090607 AT sonic DOT net>
	<20130630114524 DOT 02f33168 AT warrawoona DOT sti>
Date:	Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:02:26 +0400
Message-ID:	<CAOxVtSQGj-KfdB8FKe5Jdkf0MDSuynC2oABXzG9PcbF+r0zJOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gschem and metric sizes for symbols
From:	Sergey Alyoshin <alyoshin DOT s AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Alexey Shaposhnikov
<avshap AT nerdshack DOT com> wrote:
>> I guess you are worried about the size the symbol actually prints out at
>> when you sent it to a printer?
>
> Yes, because these sizes rigidly defined in standards.

As I remember, this standard define proportion, not absolute size
(5.4.2 in [1]).


>> Maybe you can solve your problem by just using a 100 gschem-unit grid
>> for creating symbols, but make your own title block that scales that to
>> the correct metric length when printed?
>
> I tried this (or use "scale" option of gaf export command). And here's the
> problem appeared: with convenient for symbols drawing scaling factor line width
> of pins and nets became too small (and i can't find how to change it without
> editing defines.h in libgeda source). And if it try to keep acceptable line
> width then using 100-unit grid for symbol's pin placement became a headache.

By the way, I have A4 and A3 title blocks at [2].

[1] http://protect.gost.ru/v.aspx?control=8&baseC=-1&page=0&month=-1&year=-1&search=&RegNum=1&DocOnPageCount=15&id=166289&pageK=F39B1EE9-36F5-4CD5-9C8B-B5260294268A

[2] http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/sergey_alyoshin/

- Raw text -