X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<51CA3143.9050104@sonic.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:09:39 -0700
From:	Dave Curtis <davecurtis AT sonic DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA
References:	<CAK=z9GWkMwS3NiLEgpvWuPgBVrGB+sHqb7DLCgYZTC3C1OyLSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAK=z9GUWzhidWQsvxhWqYpSnyvUnmsut1+gatrMVvJqMM6L_UA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kpfolc$gma$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <51BBA5E7 DOT 4040006 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhQD-xY9dB37+Z-pkDwRQBrqv1aOew9a2W-J1n2g00Gdew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1371329763 DOT 11314 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <4DFFE27A-47A1-41DB-98CC-490E1AB6085A AT jump-ing DOT de> <20130617012721 DOT 01e56f87 AT akka> <51C48E65 DOT 10508 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhR2Ef9xYcC=PUf6SzruVD0C8vFTQ3U1+Bhb95ft3Nqk+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq28fn$5g1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhQXUr8vFzL867wWowRFpvLx-xc9F9sX6dH-afamQMosTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq2jls$k0q$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhTWQNMezQxZo=VZtRWHd0jBmHQ=9MNQ_5LEdSA=EkW0rA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhTs5_3ZCOEmF3Z9tMgxTJWmVLU=3nzU-_O4ThsL7yipzg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51C5BC66 DOT 6050308 AT ecosensory DOT com> <6C92EC8D-2A12-4E1B-8C08-C2812F4DBAD3 AT jump-ing DOT de> <51C7833C DOT 4080108 AT ecosensory DOT com> <kq81mh$7di$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <51CA2655 DOT 1000907 AT ecosensory DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<51CA2655.1000907@ecosensory.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 06/25/2013 04:23 PM, John Griessen wrote:
> On 06/23/2013 06:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>> STEP, hands down.
>> It is reasonable feature complete. It is. . . . .. . .
>> Only downside is, that STEP is a behemoth of a format. About the
>> extreme opposite of the PCB format;-)   Some time back I hade a
>> cursory glance at how it does basic 3Dgeometry. Afterwards, I knew,
>> why kicad or eagle developers chose VRML for their 3D ambitions.
>
> What about this:
>
> http://stepcode.org/mw/index.php?title=How_to_use_STEPcode_in_an_application 
>
>
> meanwhile, back to studying openscad again.
>
implicitCAD http://www.implicitcad.org/ is also worth a look. Nearly 
syntax-compatible with openscad, but more purely declarative.  I've 
successfully printed parts from implicitCAD on my makerbot.  Docs are 
still a bit sketchy.

-dave

- Raw text -