X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.0 cv=Odoa/2vY c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=wniM0YfUJoQA:10 a=oQDvWQo6hwEA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wR-FlJDvAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=RME7Cwcw2aEA:10 a=2JJDMpQXK5Y52_6i8AsA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
X-Authenticated-User:
X-Originating-IP:	70.113.67.117
Message-ID:	<51C5BC66.6050308@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:01:58 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA
References:	<CAK=z9GWkMwS3NiLEgpvWuPgBVrGB+sHqb7DLCgYZTC3C1OyLSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51B6CDB6 DOT 1010909 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAK=z9GUWzhidWQsvxhWqYpSnyvUnmsut1+gatrMVvJqMM6L_UA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kpfolc$gma$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <51BBA5E7 DOT 4040006 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhQD-xY9dB37+Z-pkDwRQBrqv1aOew9a2W-J1n2g00Gdew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1371329763 DOT 11314 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <4DFFE27A-47A1-41DB-98CC-490E1AB6085A AT jump-ing DOT de> <20130617012721 DOT 01e56f87 AT akka> <51C48E65 DOT 10508 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhR2Ef9xYcC=PUf6SzruVD0C8vFTQ3U1+Bhb95ft3Nqk+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq28fn$5g1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhQXUr8vFzL867wWowRFpvLx-xc9F9sX6dH-afamQMosTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq2jls$k0q$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhTWQNMezQxZo=VZtRWHd0jBmHQ=9MNQ_5LEdSA=EkW0rA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhTs5_3ZCOEmF3Z9tMgxTJWmVLU=3nzU-_O4ThsL7yipzg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhTs5_3ZCOEmF3Z9tMgxTJWmVLU=3nzU-_O4ThsL7yipzg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 06/21/2013 06:15 PM, Evan Foss wrote:
> Yes BRL Cad does not truly support STEP or IGES but they are working
> on it. The codebase has been steadaly moving to openNURBS for some
> time now.

That sounds promising.  Maybe McNeel et al will support that so some open tools
work, and they still have Rhino to sell to the speediest users, and open
SW tool users might get better access to work implemented with Rhino too.

John

- Raw text -