X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=L15mKSAHqqGUbG/3MJMLSANR2PkC2JB0hP0XXWeNqJw=;
	b=VLw2Ctq+2262pxevlFUhSJYDEGRGiC1yj3eCZpoE23YpVz/ee6Ijjp4QaPf9///yzU
	mIUmB0IyZupOyNgnAbPhrosE46EtK1JH+gA8BZ7BWumuMNCFrnty86EaAvh08cEE305R
	bkjD3p/EJYM9SPgwf1wcwAhnbtG4i+KaX5yyMIdfefAPZVQYWPw+U7a46ZCPFUiqw1ux
	hrUxaL2zXGq7d5KTfum7z4cilNC34GTPL6ntcDk2X3uvQj0dxrMzk5osHkdgrg5MJXTg
	VekxQdpiPhvN2+tAteRuveyq/+5+fxS9Rbkari/8qRyDx0RcIHSLA4UMX/pBhukDecNN
	Oc8A==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.66.27.44 with SMTP id q12mr11002376pag.138.1371436035841;
	Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<51BE5243.6010503@sonic.net>
References:	<CAK=z9GWkMwS3NiLEgpvWuPgBVrGB+sHqb7DLCgYZTC3C1OyLSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<51B6CDB6 DOT 1010909 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk>
	<51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk>
	<CAK=z9GUWzhidWQsvxhWqYpSnyvUnmsut1+gatrMVvJqMM6L_UA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<kpfolc$gma$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<51BBA5E7 DOT 4040006 AT prochac DOT sk>
	<CAM2RGhQD-xY9dB37+Z-pkDwRQBrqv1aOew9a2W-J1n2g00Gdew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1371329763 DOT 11314 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap>
	<CAM2RGhRJ3QWHJxAWF53XPHKtibioW5+4TDyBpwmpC5hNz__SDQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1371384274 DOT 12373 DOT 5 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap>
	<20130617014023 DOT 72a37a55 AT akka>
	<51BE5243 DOT 6010503 AT sonic DOT net>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:27:15 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhRhZx93+0M=3bydr5dQKsM5jU_F+dU-ZS8pciVM+3uTFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA
From:	Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I think Dave Curtis has hit the important point. I don't know that I
agree with the eye candy part but having 3D export is more useful than
modeling in PCB.

3D export expands the toolchain to other things like modeling and
physics simulation.

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Curtis <davecurtis AT sonic DOT net> wrote:
> On 06/16/2013 04:40 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>>
>> Peter Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> schrieb am 16. June 2013:
>>
>>> My most recent thoughts on 3D + PCB + CAD, was to offload to a separate
>>> process, which is non GPL (e.g. GPL/LGPL + exception for Opencascade),
>>> and use that process to convert "real" 3D cad files into a triangulated
>>> (BOT) like format for easier consumption and rendering on screen.
>>
>> Inclusion of 3D handling and rendering in pcb would require huge
>> efforts to get it right. Essentially, you'd start half a 3D mechanical
>> CAD application from scratch. There is a reason why the open source
>> world is not exactly abundant with 3D CAD. Why not refer this task to a
>> separate, specialized application -- just like it is done with
>> gerbv for viewing gerber files?
>>
>> My personal favourite for this is freecad --> See my other mail.
>>
>> ---<)kaimartin(>---
>
> I'd go even farther... there really isn't much point in a 3D rendering of a
> PCB by itself -- that is just eye candy for posting in your blog.  But...
> being able to import a model of an PCB into your mechanical design as a
> part, now *that* has value.   What I'm interested in is getting the screw
> hols in the right place, making sure that the big 'lytic caps don't bonk
> into a rib or strut, and make sure that the heat sinks actually *do* end up
> in the air flow.
>
> -dave
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -