X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID:	<519ADFA6.7000005@neurotica.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 22:44:54 -0400
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] ITEAD?
References:	<51970516 DOT 6040101 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAL5HA=DVx7-YL=hrUkAzDh18ncWU7ffwmuzyhGUk8dzaZuKzyA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5199AB8C DOT 5060501 AT neurotica DOT com> <CANDNR8qOPEadaaExuEcYbV_sf=YvXk6b6Zx9xhEVJQkyphFFSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <519AB9DC DOT 4060906 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAKakQcdG0BwtH9MJ+yBqos2GazXyCGWn8oH7emXnjZMBuvJRxQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130521013029 DOT 16526 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAKakQcezZO_Q1DVOUqRz1bqJKWZX=yiu80eaNw310WBv=8Lnpw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAKakQcezZO_Q1DVOUqRz1bqJKWZX=yiu80eaNw310WBv=8Lnpw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.5.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 05/20/2013 10:08 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
>> Stephen Ecob wrote:
>>> one of the engineers of our "partner" company was very happy to
>>> explain how he'd modified it to give better linearity
>>
>> What were his modifications?
>>
>> Did he change some of your assumptions in order to accomplish the
>> better performance?
> 
> The PCA was an isolator for reading current shunts.  The 50mV peak
> shunt signal was boosted to about 5V and galvanically isolated.
> It was based on a linear optocoupler.  This optocoupler had a small
> but significant nonlinearity.  To obtain high accuracy we
> characterised this nonlinearity and cancelled it out in SW after the
> signal was digitised.

  !!

  Hey, feel like sharing that? :-)  (hey, the Chinese already have it!)

             -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -