X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID:	<519ADF82.8090000@neurotica.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 22:44:18 -0400
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] ITEAD?
References:	<51970516 DOT 6040101 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAL5HA=DVx7-YL=hrUkAzDh18ncWU7ffwmuzyhGUk8dzaZuKzyA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5199AB8C DOT 5060501 AT neurotica DOT com> <CANDNR8qOPEadaaExuEcYbV_sf=YvXk6b6Zx9xhEVJQkyphFFSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <519AB9DC DOT 4060906 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAKakQcdG0BwtH9MJ+yBqos2GazXyCGWn8oH7emXnjZMBuvJRxQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAKakQcdG0BwtH9MJ+yBqos2GazXyCGWn8oH7emXnjZMBuvJRxQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.5.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 05/20/2013 08:51 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
>>   Should I have any concerns about "IP harvesting" with these Chinese
>> outfits?  (probably not with the Aussie gent, I'd assume..)
> 
> It's always a possibility.
> I've had the rather surreal experience of walking through a plant room
> in China and seeing a PCA that I'd designed, but suddenly realising
> that it wasn't my design but something derived from it.  When I asked
> about it, one of the engineers of our "partner" company was very happy
> to explain how he'd modified it to give better linearity and how it
> was so much cheaper for them to make it for themselves instead of
> buying it from Australia !
> The management of the company I was working for didn't seem to care,
> they said that my PCA was just a small component in a very big deal
> and we shouldn't jeopardise that by making a fuss.  This same company
> went bust within two years, go figure.

  That's, umm, terrifying.

           -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -