X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1363549190; bh=VoOH13Q9NzuGl4KBx2EKDjtQOb5E8+uuOnAYueSIIlM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aNccSfTXpntAiBA4c5skaWUYJJXFMl42kLGDiE1n6430iadtgN2oVc9HisOQ0t9DZEx4Uu/D/zlSN4Xg3nlUDQgc4EXIC0Zd7H7JDb1yurCgH52RQ29qzR79n8oPw26eT9SFi5xyni6xNYxii0rJsaxxyhp1N6ZH4fywQLSKZT8=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:	603776 DOT 86245 DOT bm AT smtp106 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT bf1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:	ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG:	Qu4crAMVM1lr8R2jYLt2yLGw0sONgezI7uXUUtk1BFSuIYk
	uQAthlZa62ursUrp4mbJHx9iodWkxDrBi4JjbJjbCMJJjRxbfwz7.QZl6NmO
	fx_zSW5V2lxv5jm3wmcA3HSO.kmY2GquRy0m3q1sExiXJgaWF_UqHzENKT5o
	FbaXwmATLrpBLheVXKErQb.0y7oObyJnjlwfr2XDkj_E5WS2hNp45S5xneNL
	L9NT8Kjm13LwDicbeichnvgKVNRCraPwngHBBX0qAWzeBUAfMe64yUUyXnxc
	tSlTjXIS8nXsoM50Rd0UKvnoIO0kXiP9IUMDeHF.hv7tagPwgFaVXFU81Fxl
	H_oMO0DBoy5sl5oq0UGgbR9PsHuuN.1rfW28dQusWvufnK0XKX4yhh3i7oOA
	n3oG6rAUDW5_lh.oVAWMoI.xyoZxTwdq73YaRZ077Wkh15gPNih611LZFGeR
	B5umUsMJ6SMx7qS21ysw.CrWkU6oTwXkdAF_T0A--
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	f_DTt3mswBBgAkQlHvfWr7fedPivEj8lM_i1QPTGLa1z0f7XFiw-
Message-ID:	<51461B6A.8030508@sbcglobal.net>
Date:	Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:37:14 -0700
From:	"Girvin R. Herr" <girvin DOT herr AT sbcglobal DOT net>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA run under KDE4?
References:	<3b3d4a45 DOT 2a671 DOT 13d7948874f DOT Webtop DOT 8 AT optonline DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<3b3d4a45.2a671.13d7948874f.Webtop.8@optonline.net>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

GENE GLICK wrote:
>
>
> this just occurred to me, that you can always change to a different 
> desktop if KDE doesn't suit you. Slackware comes with a few, KDE being 
> one of them. I have also tried fluxbox and probably some the other 
> built-in desktops and they all worked out okay with gschem and PCB. 
> Maybe you would prefer one of the other light wieght desktops instead.
>
Gene,
Thanks for your reply. I am not there yet, but I will certainly keep 
your suggestions in mind if I have any problems with KDE4 and gEDA.  
 From what I am hearing, I don't expect any.
Girvin

- Raw text -