X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:x-authentication-warning:date:from:x-x-sender:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version
	:content-type:x-virus-scanned:x-virus-status;
	bh=Fh6Imra1s4cw2aS0z9yZYzfuCAoBgM5XvbLEvNzl23M=;
	b=NPm8tsnXkoSFKyB89GzHlDgPAMt5MumLjRBdtQ/8AqJpYKUsDdNy/LTouAl+zojlKH
	qqCFo/8x+MqWZCVKZooNuiUIA7DeJWPEPzZZcvO6SHSEvP2GN33NXrZ1usT4utsnceLT
	pOKspbpPvxuFlulqyjvbXU0hQcWWtEYwKvcghoFGUmaSXzfSFyODfqFDeNlu0mpKoAMU
	QcJQjmyTRM82Ywpmt50kRxQXSrocv1SDSzUB9E+tWhL0fA0TjbVw4Zr4vAwgK49tvO+w
	Y7h06qEj8VxiBLraaZdZC+sFarjwNwzEdcKTnJGARZnQg8IV0cHBbKzyX8E5LuxKQ7CE
	1oOQ==
X-Received:	by 10.236.73.135 with SMTP id v7mr5139618yhd.178.1362070846881;
	Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:00:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning:	grumpy2.grumpy-net: rray owned process doing -bs
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:00:43 -0600 (CST)
From:	kqt4at5v AT gmail DOT com
X-X-Sender:	rray AT grumpy2 DOT grumpy-net
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] surface mount confusion
In-Reply-To:	<512F885D.3000304@neurotica.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302281059270.4237@tehzcl2.tehzcl-arg>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1302280929500 DOT 4237 AT tehzcl2 DOT tehzcl-arg> <512F803B DOT 2040301 AT neurotica DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1302281024240 DOT 4237 AT tehzcl2 DOT tehzcl-arg> <512F885D DOT 3000304 AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Virus-Scanned:	clamav-milter 0.97.5 at grumpy2
X-Virus-Status:	Clean
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Dave McGuire wrote:

> On 02/28/2013 11:26 AM, kqt4at5v AT gmail DOT com wrote:
>>>> Being a beginner with not so steady a hand I choose to stick to
>>>> through hole devices But I just tried a simple board with a soic
>>>> chip I made a breakout board for TPIC2810D 1 chip and a single
>>>> row header of 16 pins The board is single sided so the chip is on
>>>> the solder side and the header is on the opposite side I setup
>>>> the board so pin 1 of the chip is connected to pin 1 of the
>>>> header and so on When viewed in pcb the traces appear not be
>>>> connected correctly but when I export to gcode they are correct
>>>> Would someone set an old fella straight
>>>
>>> I would love to help but I'm not sure I understand specifically
>>> what the problem is...can you describe what you mean by "traces
>>> appear not to be connected correctly"?
>>>
>>>> If I were to try this on a more complex board it would make me
>>>> crossed eyed
>>>
>>> Nah...I lay out surface mount PCBs and build prototypes for them
>>> all the time.  It's just a different skill set from doing
>>> through-hole work. I actually despise through-hole work anymore,
>>> and minimize it when possible.  (not just due to the additional
>>> assembly cost when a design goes to volume production!)
>>>
>>
>> I attached screwed up pcb
>
>  Ok.  At first glance, it appears that the traces are on the bottom
> (solder) side of the board...they will of course make contact with the
> through-hole header pins, but the footprint for the TPIC2810D is on the
> top (component) side of the board...there will be no electrical
> connection to them.
>
>  You'll need to either redraw those traces on the top side of the
> board, move the chip to the bottom of the board, or use vias to get
> those signals up to the top of the board.  Get it?
>

Got it
This was good little practice

Thanks
Richard

- Raw text -