X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Cam-AntiVirus:	no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails:	not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo:	http://www.ucs.cam.ac.uk/email/scanner/
Message-ID:	<1359806241.3209.0.camel@pcjc2lap.cheyneydesign.local>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [patch] Pinnumbers in mosfet-with-diode-1.sym
From:	Peter Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:57:21 +0000
In-Reply-To:	<20130131100136.GP32216@fi.muni.cz>
References:	<20130130090351 DOT GE32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1359555319 DOT 2295 DOT 9 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1301310418000 DOT 7105 AT igor2priv>
	<20130131100136 DOT GP32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu2
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 11:01 +0100, Jan Kasprzaka
> 	The other problem is that the whole process (gschem -> gsch2pcb -> pcb)
> _silently_ discards the nets with non-numeric pinnumbers. So you start with
> a schematics, run gsch2pcb and pcb, and the resulting layout has missing
> connections, without _any_ notification that something is wrong.

Can you post a simple test-case for this?  I'm fairly sure this should
NOT be the case. BGA pin-numbers are often along the lines "B23" or
"A10" etc.., and I _think_ "

There is a strangeness with lower-case suffixes on refdes being ignored
(by design - probably misguidedly). I don't recall having ever noticed
it for netnames.

> -Yenya
> 

-- 
Peter Clifton <peter DOT clifton AT clifton-electronics DOT co DOT uk>

Clifton Electronics

- Raw text -