delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:46:05 +0100 |
From: | Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] [patch] Pinnumbers in mosfet-with-diode-1.sym |
Message-ID: | <20130131024605.3536b873@akka> |
In-Reply-To: | <1359555319.2295.9.camel@AMD64X2> |
References: | <20130130090351 DOT GE32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> |
<1359555319 DOT 2295 DOT 9 DOT camel AT AMD64X2> | |
X-Mailer: | Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Provags-ID: | V02:K0:TXBUjD1198eeJvFm7wEs7cfC1aYlgbdUyfUPK8H6nma |
AAEqzEZGiv7t001KDZzJyGrzqgSVKtznE5UhsnuQzKoV9Uui2o | |
sfV5Erm6gySrzjEkbOb36mqnTVc1++heiFdXgWjgeCtm/DVwgW | |
G4RQZF80Jveu6Rk3BbCJLUYSEldg+sQxgCJzFeu2x7Yelk50xk | |
Xqw00J+gF1DqUh/NRSeCxFf0VdyhjjKtmhTXjFqbTBRjp3Xt7U | |
5jbb1gUJ/JVf+dWCpusPUFAEF7G66WrYHHQm9dMmEgNF53hfY5 | |
k37yTKlofuANejw/l3gWSDj2b55KakSQBYIkUs2MaBXN72Gfg= | |
= | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--Sig_/qwqPuhurgeBgG0ELSjaM2ob Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> schrieb am 30. January 2013: > There is nothing really broken +1 > the user should replace the letters with > correct numbers for his transistor. It would be possible to let the > letters unchanged, if we use an exactly matched footprint for PCB > layout -- that footprint would have letters too instead of numbers. I prefer the latter. Manufacturers tend to enumerate pins in data sheets in different ways. In my experience, letters that refer to actual function are less prone to misread than digits. In addition, letters work the same across different packages. TO220, TO247, TO92, TO18, TO252, D2PAK, SO23, SOT23, etc. > But then we would need a really large number of footprints, because of > possible permutations of the letters. Only some permutations are actually used. Of course, with letters you have to provide geometrically identical footprints for MOSFETs and bipolar transistors. On the other hand, there is only one symbol to cater them all. Seems like this is a case of "pick your poison". ---<)kaimartin(>--- --=20 Kai-Martin Knaak --Sig_/qwqPuhurgeBgG0ELSjaM2ob Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEJzN0ACgkQt9RkiGwLn1OdFQCgtThPRLs9Yks+PbSkqFnDIUWN qt8AniHfFbc3dbcyjdV36WdIGuyhgL/s =W42c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qwqPuhurgeBgG0ELSjaM2ob--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |