Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/01/16/15:23:40
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
|
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com
|
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
|
| d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
|
| h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
|
| :content-type;
|
| bh=gj2JPjwyxhbFsFEca3kI4k4d5e8B+2/kxVLefpw1EL8=;
|
| b=NL10FzayBywBmpxguu6VzfkU7BxVRxQueUWJO8eN5Dc/m7p3Dx7FsQkWEvMQ4FgPGO
|
| GDHFzQmoD7/R2V5mQahM5dfPsk65YYW044pzvAV/XVXNd7m88mrpndI3DuazrcpNqgLI
|
| dyIDI0TEJd3JCSot2SOrLrCN0ew5f4GgyTHlQC89hFplnPMnxFpR4sznFYm4TPXxSlD4
|
| b4MJ2X4l1XoccZLIWLZy8UPcMLz8mQIjw5VUgzk7CTPVSEVqIw9aRqNvlvdBbWv2mdIl
|
| Fosrteo4F0hKTDqyVClVDqptE2920zZN2+iKrjKI/3qNEvmEF0hIH7cpbNE9bNckVxpH
|
| cFxw==
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
X-Received: | by 10.42.63.145 with SMTP id c17mr1554699ici.22.1358367804194;
|
| Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:23:24 -0800 (PST)
|
Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:23:24 -0200
|
Message-ID: | <CAFfN_23UzAVVk0-TSZyVZihFmq1-0v0gpB7o4uxe3KgxDFDG0w@mail.gmail.com>
|
Subject: | [geda-user] libgeda circle parsing
|
From: | =?UTF-8?Q?Antonio_Todo_Bom_=E2=9C=88?= <atodobom AT gmail DOT com>
|
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com
|
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com
|
--90e6ba3fcd87717e6304d36da6ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I don't know if I'm right, but analysing the code at o_circle_basic.c, I
found:
if (radius <= 0) {
s_log_message(_("Found a zero or negative radius circle [ %c %d %d %d
%d ]\n"),
type, x1, y1, radius, color);
s_log_message (_("Setting radius to 0\n"));
radius = 0;
}
If the routine certifies that circle has not a null or negative radius,
why it adjusts it to zero? Couldn't be better to adjust to any non zero
standard value, to turn the object more visible at the design?
Regards,
Antonio
--90e6ba3fcd87717e6304d36da6ad
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I don't know if I'm right, but analysing the code =
at o_circle_basic.c, I found:<div><br></div><div><div><br></div><div>=A0 if=
(radius <=3D 0) {</div><div>=A0 =A0 s_log_message(_("Found a zero =
or negative radius circle [ %c %d %d %d %d ]\n"),</div>
<div>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 type, x1, y1, radius, color);</div=
><div>=A0 =A0 s_log_message (_("Setting radius to 0\n"));</div><d=
iv>=A0 =A0 radius =3D 0;</div><div>=A0 }</div><div><br></div><div><br></div=
><div>=A0=A0If the routine certifies that circle has not a null or negative=
radius, why it adjusts it to zero? Couldn't be better to adjust to any=
non zero standard value, to turn the object more visible at the design?</d=
iv>
</div><div><br></div><div style>Regards,</div><div style><br></div><div sty=
le>Antonio</div></div>
--90e6ba3fcd87717e6304d36da6ad--
- Raw text -