X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:02:29 +0100
From:	Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary
Message-ID:	<20121218080229.GA24102@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212120740300 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
	<CAN0Jx-_+HNgHFNwjNkZRos--yRa9KWLeijjaE7zh5imjp5omuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212150453530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
	<CAN0Jx-8mr2XmLHr7AzcTygk205H1H4_X1Y9VcQHw3zia5eGynQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAN-_CWyXNvnumf5OC+m-xRV0zMf3cCvyzLU3be_pC8DkNVZG0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAN-_CWyXNvnumf5OC+m-xRV0zMf3cCvyzLU3be_pC8DkNVZG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SPF-Received:	2
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Ham
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 05:46:56PM +1100, Geoff Swan wrote:
> I'll briefly throw in my 2 cents...
> I think being able to manually assign nets to copper would be really
> useful. I've done this when designing with altium and it works great. If
> this where to become possible I think it would be well used. I also think
> that having tools/heuristics/macros to assist along the way is a great
> idea. As has been said neither heuristics nor net tagging are complete
> solutions in isolation, but both sound like they would be useful to have
> (even if not both can be done).
> 
> My main reason for emailing though is to go back to what I think may have
> started this thread in the first place... is there any chance of getting
> the functionality whereby when I press 'O' to optimise a rats nest, then
> hover over a net and press 'F'  I get everything in that net highlighted?
> (whether routed, partially routed or just connected via a rat) I'm sure I
> used to be able to do this, and it feels like I'm hamstrung without it... I
> note that 'F' will still highlight connected copper, but it no longer
> treats a rat line as connecting disconnected copper...
> It was a fantastic tool... I could use 'F' without the rats nest showing to
> highlight only connected copper, or I could use 'O' -> 'F' to highlight all
> the copper that needed to be connected...

Indeed I miss this too. This was commit 764c3560a722c768a7048f5c70811ec363862882
which you hopefully can revert.

Since around this commit the ratsnest also behave strangely when moving
components. If I remember correctly, they had a proper rubber banding 
behaviour before I updated, and it is no more the case, but this may have
been caused by another patch.

While we are at it, I think that "O" should be rather a "ratsnest on"
option. Processors are fast enough nowadays, and reoptimizing the ratsnest
everytime you draw a line or move component would not be that expensive.
In this case "E" should become a "ratsnest off" command.

	Gabriel

- Raw text -