X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=J6dJM8VJlysmHkjHlEgE0FDvXnHrEqEpP4ld8IPWc6s=;
	b=VylsRMHDFJiKgrZY8vfl8IaL1GwA5xojfcXoPS+aEXoAdgpeaT6FkI6XBB5GzAl6tV
	xj+1QFk4pqmGl4Vc5HF5aQGPc13NbghqxbukBuJFHVR/BNST+fX9EA0W9EhflyyD2D68
	GIicjEaaqt2lgGbpowLJrDeY40QIQFiOgnWCg33vf1WNIUXFWuhRlZXLk02LUqzMlQsO
	tX1SGthx6yjbUHmLs6lbX/Fg03FH71KXmdnDeryZpHie0ZDKSrD1g3qPtarzBAqIbh8z
	EWKiJce93gRbTsNynC/VRRUI9n5UqM1PrAYQJcObRhjqoJae+sEWAxtCz7ImcReiZLZW
	P9Qw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAN0Jx-8mr2XmLHr7AzcTygk205H1H4_X1Y9VcQHw3zia5eGynQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212120740300 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
	<CAN0Jx-_+HNgHFNwjNkZRos--yRa9KWLeijjaE7zh5imjp5omuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212150453530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
	<CAN0Jx-8mr2XmLHr7AzcTygk205H1H4_X1Y9VcQHw3zia5eGynQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:46:56 +1100
Message-ID:	<CAN-_CWyXNvnumf5OC+m-xRV0zMf3cCvyzLU3be_pC8DkNVZG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary
From:	Geoff Swan <shinobi DOT jack AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--20cf3005dcae2ce26e04d11addff
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'll briefly throw in my 2 cents...
I think being able to manually assign nets to copper would be really
useful. I've done this when designing with altium and it works great. If
this where to become possible I think it would be well used. I also think
that having tools/heuristics/macros to assist along the way is a great
idea. As has been said neither heuristics nor net tagging are complete
solutions in isolation, but both sound like they would be useful to have
(even if not both can be done).

My main reason for emailing though is to go back to what I think may have
started this thread in the first place... is there any chance of getting
the functionality whereby when I press 'O' to optimise a rats nest, then
hover over a net and press 'F'  I get everything in that net highlighted?
(whether routed, partially routed or just connected via a rat) I'm sure I
used to be able to do this, and it feels like I'm hamstrung without it... I
note that 'F' will still highlight connected copper, but it no longer
treats a rat line as connecting disconnected copper...
It was a fantastic tool... I could use 'F' without the rats nest showing to
highlight only connected copper, or I could use 'O' -> 'F' to highlight all
the copper that needed to be connected...

cheers,

Geoff

--20cf3005dcae2ce26e04d11addff
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I&#39;ll briefly throw in my 2 cents...<div>I think being able to manually =
assign nets to copper would be really useful. I&#39;ve done this when desig=
ning with altium and it works great. If this where to become possible I thi=
nk it would be well used. I also think that having tools/heuristics/macros =
to assist along the way is a great idea. As has been said neither heuristic=
s nor net tagging are complete solutions in isolation, but both sound like =
they would be useful to have (even if not both can be done).</div>
<div><br></div><div>My main reason for emailing though is to go back to wha=
t I think may have started this thread in the first place... is there any c=
hance of getting the functionality whereby when I press &#39;O&#39; to opti=
mise a rats nest, then hover over a net and press &#39;F&#39; =A0I get ever=
ything in that net highlighted? (whether routed, partially routed or just c=
onnected via a rat) I&#39;m sure I used to be able to do this, and it feels=
 like I&#39;m hamstrung without it... I note that &#39;F&#39; will still hi=
ghlight connected copper, but it no longer treats a rat line as connecting =
disconnected copper...</div>
<div>It was a fantastic tool... I could use &#39;F&#39; without the rats ne=
st showing to highlight only connected copper, or I could use &#39;O&#39; -=
&gt; &#39;F&#39; to highlight all the copper that needed to be connected...=
</div>
<div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Geoff</div><div><br></=
div><div><br></div>

--20cf3005dcae2ce26e04d11addff--

- Raw text -