X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<50CB4CD3.3080707@zepler.net>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:59:15 +0000
From:	Chris Smith <cjs94 AT zepler DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines
References:	<20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212090407031 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <1355188647 DOT 12937 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <A7B4EDBD-3704-4837-9350-A16559C60A2A AT noqsi DOT com> <1355442697 DOT 2993 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <008677C3-7BA0-4B7D-B8E7-D0A5B2CCC573 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212140350530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <898C7D41-7B55-4D61-9CC6-7ABB560C144E AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212140458230 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <5189151C-7C93-4AD6-A154-185C8F7AC203 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212140537520 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <6E00459F-C749-4DE5-B182-44A8623E70E8 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212141012260 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <C0A29256-3D74-4C3F-B2A0-150F85C85047 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212141116350 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <50CB1FFC DOT 1010600 AT zepler DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212141419090 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1212141419090.26605@igor2priv>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.4.6
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 14/12/2012 13:41, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> 
> In this system your above method is Markus' first touch method and some
> extra details. With these details it would work better and would not
> restrict the user to build traces only in one way, but I still have some
> questions:
> 
> 1. what happens if I cut an existing, tagged net in a way a segment
> falls off? Does it become a floating (not associated) net or, does it
> keep its tag reflecting original user intention?

IMHO, the system should never automatically change an attribute from a
specific to a more general value -- to do so is effectively throwing
away information.  The track segment should keep its association; the
user can manually change it if desired.

> 2. What happens if I draw a line accross the board shorting two random
> nets? I started the line in the middle of nothing, so it would be
> floating (if starting point matters; causing 2 shorts); or would it be
> attached to the net of the first line it hits (first touch; only one
> short, with the second line)?
> 
> 3. alternative wording of 2.: what happens if I add an object that
> connects an existing floating net to two existing non-floating nets in
> the same time?

To be honest I don't think it really matters, as long as it behaves in a
consistent manner.  I would suggest inheriting the netname of the first
connected track and marking a short with the second.

Chris
-- 
Chris Smith <cjs94 AT zepler DOT net>

- Raw text -