X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.0 cv=YruNtvkX c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=yvSPhu-8laEA:10 a=-bErWWmhtBcA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wR-FlJDvAAAA:8 a=caKvSo6u0qMA:10 a=hNojQerkQF50ANb0sfcA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9SQSvs8foZg1dwx7:21 a=IB5xP9uoJUzM-pYK:21 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
X-Authenticated-User:
X-Originating-IP:	70.113.67.117
Message-ID:	<50CAA11E.4010109@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:46:38 -0600
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.9) Gecko/20121015 Icedove/10.0.9
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines
References:	<20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212090407031 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <1355188647 DOT 12937 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <A7B4EDBD-3704-4837-9350-A16559C60A2A AT noqsi DOT com> <1355442697 DOT 2993 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <008677C3-7BA0-4B7D-B8E7-D0A5B2CCC573 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212140350530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <898C7D41-7B55-4D61-9CC6-7ABB560C144E AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<898C7D41-7B55-4D61-9CC6-7ABB560C144E@noqsi.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 12/13/2012 09:27 PM, John Doty wrote:
> for finding an incidental short, "the least number of traces" is a heuristic. There's no guarantee that those are the correct traces to break.

Combined with the heavy weighting on traces known to be self and widespread,
and often involved in difficult to debug shorts, like VCC and GND, the minimum number of cuts
will be very helpful and close to the problem, or suggest removing a trace that touches in multiple places.

John

- Raw text -