Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/12/13/19:00:54
On Dec 13, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 09:39 -0600, John Griessen wrote:
>> On 12/11/12 16:31, Peter Clifton wrote:
>>> It wouldn't be a big jump to
>>> generalise to giving each object a list of connected objects as well as
>>> a list of affects-geometry objects.
>>
>>
>> That, and leaving the info in the netlist would be a big leap in usability
>> for simulations.
>
> What kind of simulation are you thinking about?
Probably the kind we do in VLSI design: we extract parasitics from the layout, incorporate them in a (vastly expanded) netlist, and simulate that to verify the physical circuit should behave as intended.
>
> So far, we're discussing mods for PCB. We'd probably need similar in
> gschem / libgeda for simulations, no? (Or did you mean simulations
> relating to a PCB layout)?
>
>
> --
> Peter Clifton <peter DOT clifton AT clifton-electronics DOT co DOT uk>
>
> Clifton Electronics
>
>
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com
- Raw text -