delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Peter Clifton wrote: > Actually, I would consider the thermals / connections to pins and pads > to be connections in the graph too, so they would be tested for the > effect of their removal like other copper in the net. That's a good idea. > Polygons become easier to understand in the simpler graph case, they > just become a multiply connected node (probably most connection edges > are thermals linking to pin nodes). > Yes, this was the polygon handling case I listed as highlight the whole poly and let the user remove it and resolve rats. In case of a ground plane connected to other pins as well, this may not be the easiest approach. With the thermal trick, it's possible to detach problematic pins from the poly - but if voting goes wrong (in a VCC-GND short for example) we may end up with a suggestion to remove all the ground pins and leave VCC pins convert the ground plane to VCC plane.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |