X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.0 cv=JuRzXbEC c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=yvSPhu-8laEA:10 a=SQvomHtPtS0A:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wR-FlJDvAAAA:8 a=thNQAIeazvYA:10 a=CoNPr2VAu0TN-EG6ZroA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
X-Authenticated-User:
X-Originating-IP:	70.113.67.117
Message-ID:	<50C766FB.1010709@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:01:47 -0600
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.9) Gecko/20121015 Icedove/10.0.9
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Router fun with rubberbands
References:	<1354748372 DOT 3386 DOT 3 DOT camel AT AMD64X2> <k9sr8u$29l$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <1354900205 DOT 3512 DOT 34 DOT camel AT AMD64X2> <CAC4O8c8bxN6gphbG6afG=nU8Twp-xcZZHMwTtwn=viV3=evEOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAAOVysEQWd17jEkYXGcJ3oo6e4i3a8RtZ+6xykRddDP+ExaC=w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201212080002 DOT qB802iXg022341 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <87k3stclr3 DOT fsf AT gag DOT com> <50C4AAA0 DOT 2050200 AT ecosensory DOT com> <201212091922 DOT qB9JMc63002780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <50C6120F DOT 5000701 AT ecosensory DOT com> <1355179738 DOT 4108 DOT 8 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
In-Reply-To:	<1355179738.4108.8.camel@AMD64X2>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 12/10/12 16:48, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Simulated annealing may be useful when we try to optimize the position
> of components. For toporouters we have the concept of cuts and cut
> capacity (distance of adjacent terminals in the constrained delaunay
> triangulation, space occupied by traces). If there is unused capacity,
> we may try to move components together to reduce PCB area and trace
> length.
>

Are you studying the toporouter code Stefan?

- Raw text -