delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=dch78IRILjsDdYTn84hEpJ26xOhxDwrPWrE9Oeedepg=; | |
b=WJe4vh3yzCTDwR9mX+t82kchQdXjiH2d7QL0b50aTqF1+L4UgM4Wmd4dfFlBvqelCN | |
sTNhqdYEV5nsEtzQ0N2N1LjT9cnW2opAjbhhNuKE1ZL2RtaFdqELcCMpKCe7h7cjhJTp | |
aUCH5DgxEj1oESBbDUEv0Ju4kTuEVC3Dbv7nPsndNJX0OW/cyP91pCLbbCiH+CNiBtFH | |
rsPzobFtQCjbyLTAYfBjK4pQIejiDEB1tSkQGfFB9y1w0bnCIDQ2iKrTMXv7aUdFYv58 | |
ud1fQ3P0ydn3zADRVIv8R2D8N8+575UZt17RsTPMgRX5qz0LRK4fdiAuSSvqnuzgDXAq | |
iqeA== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <35569664-3107-4F54-BD56-42EBEB7C0CD7@jump-ing.de> |
References: | <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> |
<20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> | |
<1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212090407031 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> | |
<20121209164921 DOT 5acd2412 AT akka> | |
<35569664-3107-4F54-BD56-42EBEB7C0CD7 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:13:40 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <CACwWb3A7pBkWcVvGuRfEL4LTpzaGefo-T1p0VuC1Q042owcD=Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines |
From: | Levente <leventelist AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--f46d0445170d2ce67b04d07bfbc5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> wrote: > > Am 09.12.2012 um 16:49 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak: > > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu schrieb am 9. December 2012: >> >> However, if we rephase the question from "what causes the short" to >>> "what user modification introduced the short" >>> >> >> +1. I tend to resolve difficult shorts by simply going back in the >> history until update nets does not complain anymore. >> >> Protel99 avoids this by a different approach: This EDA checks after >> every edit for shorts. So the user is notified immediately that an edit >> causes a violation. >> > > Do you guys never import a bunch of new or renamed components with > (x)gschem2pcb? In that case neither of these approaches is helpful, you > start with a big mess and there is no previous unshorted state. > > When I actually need the behaviour described above, I open the log window > and hit O after about every change. Shorts can be seen at a glance, they > produce more text that just a "x ratlines remaining". > > > my $0.02 > > Markus > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter > http://www.jump-ing.de/ > > > > > > --f46d0445170d2ce67b04d07bfbc5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Marku= s Hitter <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mah AT jump-ing DOT de" target=3D= "_blank">mah AT jump-ing DOT de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmai= l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left= :1ex"> <br> Am 09.12.2012 um 16:49 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im"> <a href=3D"mailto:gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" target=3D"_blank">gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT h= u</a> schrieb am =A09. December 2012:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> However, if we rephase the question from "what causes the short" = to<br> "what user modification introduced the short"<br> </blockquote> <br></div><div class=3D"im"> +1. I tend to resolve difficult shorts by simply going back in the<br> history until update nets does not complain anymore.<br> <br> Protel99 avoids this by a different approach: This EDA checks after<br> every edit for shorts. So the user is notified immediately that an edit<br> causes a violation.<br> </div></blockquote> <br> Do you guys never import a bunch of new or renamed components with (x)gsche= m2pcb? In that case neither of these approaches is helpful, you start with = a big mess and there is no previous unshorted state.<br> <br> When I actually need the behaviour described above, I open the log window a= nd hit O after about every change. Shorts can be seen at a glance, they pro= duce more text that just a "x ratlines remaining".<br> <br> <br> my $0.02<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br> Markus<br> <br> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br> Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter<br> <a href=3D"http://www.jump-ing.de/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.jump-ing.d= e/</a><br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br> --f46d0445170d2ce67b04d07bfbc5--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |