delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= |
mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id | |
:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; s=beta; bh=Yay8 | |
fBN3hTTSm75k18vvQZmlvTbZGrlCtnHz4OuK9Nc=; b=QlgQPgJWjgYAL7GB7DrR | |
fRCmmD6kSL+yqvnfM+3rwzzb0eOA9H7sucvy1E6V/7lKxyvX+iadyeKImhKomiMe | |
2J0UIbIPehbg9OhuNqh5QZqdJCY5Zq84R29FlHuJv1X75DMb+BtMZ/MBEK24ySzu | |
/78fbal+1P8Q/dvS9B9IcW0= | |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) |
In-Reply-To: | <20121209164921.5acd2412@akka> |
References: | <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212090407031 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <20121209164921 DOT 5acd2412 AT akka> |
Message-Id: | <35569664-3107-4F54-BD56-42EBEB7C0CD7@jump-ing.de> |
From: | Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines |
Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:02:59 +0100 |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailer: | Apple Mail (2.753.1) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Am 09.12.2012 um 16:49 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak: > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu schrieb am 9. December 2012: > >> However, if we rephase the question from "what causes the short" to >> "what user modification introduced the short" > > +1. I tend to resolve difficult shorts by simply going back in the > history until update nets does not complain anymore. > > Protel99 avoids this by a different approach: This EDA checks after > every edit for shorts. So the user is notified immediately that an > edit > causes a violation. Do you guys never import a bunch of new or renamed components with (x) gschem2pcb? In that case neither of these approaches is helpful, you start with a big mess and there is no previous unshorted state. When I actually need the behaviour described above, I open the log window and hit O after about every change. Shorts can be seen at a glance, they produce more text that just a "x ratlines remaining". my $0.02 Markus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |