X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	MZ0F61ec0GN8A8/xdwGcY3sg+KcBIZJAWnzdS+knhcA=; b=OSglE8duV7r2R0Md
	TT5ySLdn8vNS6QzISHIbh0J2gWqiE06wQnsS1zMZC+i+YfHHdlx30Thz4pm0y9X8
	3NXSLckHLl3oIdFdTaY2XMOjqOTJGFTdk+/LGxBBgeRTFxUSLoDYhyKrOCcD9xPS
	HRFNncDXZh31Yhs63hTMACvv+Hs=
Message-ID:	<50AB6DA2.4010901@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:46:42 +0100
From:	Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
CC:	Levente <leventelist AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] branches
References:	<CACwWb3DJsO8J_zAfcSLK=_4iviZy05ZiKj1TFMUUSA8nxO5TwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CACwWb3DJsO8J_zAfcSLK=_4iviZy05ZiKj1TFMUUSA8nxO5TwA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Am 20.11.2012 11:24, schrieb Levente:

> How the branches are treated? If we make some commit to the stable-1.8
> will it ever be merged to the master?

If you can commit to the stable-1.8 branch, you can also commit to the 
master branch. Unless I miss something :-)

> When do we fork a new branch?

For my part I do this whenever I'm not sure code should go to the master 
branch. Making a branch is cheap, you can cherry-pick to other branches, 
you can rebase branches to follow other branches and delete them if 
they're no longer needed.

For example, recently a few branches specific to single bugs appeared in 
the pcb repo. They help others to test code changes and will (I guess 
so) go away when the bug is fixed.

> If we make a change to the master, how they going to go to the stable-x.y
> branch?

Either the stable-x.y branch is rebased to a more recent commit of the 
master branch or it is cherry-picked to there.

I think some of the more experienced gEDA developers have some strategy 
with branches created to do releases. There are these 
"next-stable-release" and "next-feature-release" tags on Launchpad.

I'd like to hear about that strategy, too. In my own projects I always 
release by tagging the master branch, no release branches happen. IMHO, 
there's no point in trying to keep two branches stable and code known to 
be a regression risk shouldn't go to the master branch.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -