Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/11/17/20:31:38
On Nov 17, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> John Doty wrote:
>
>> But I think gedasymbols is fine with cvs. "If it ain't broke, don't
>> fix it."
>
> It is broken as in "I-consider-to-pull-because-cvs-is-a-such-a-PITA".
I understand the problems of cvs: that's why I use git for my development projects. But the gedasymbols cvs tree isn't a development tree, it's an image of a website, and using cvs as a mere import/export tool is trivial and trouble-free in my experience.
> Seriously. Maintenance of my section at gedasymbols.org is getting
> more and more painful as it grows.
Can you explain why in more detail? I'm puzzled.
> And compared to real comprehensive
> libraries this is just an appetizer.
I'm getting hungry. We should talk some time about adding spice-prototype attributes to your symbols so that they may be used to make simulation netlists with my spice-noqsi back end. With the right prototype, slotted and composite components are now compatible with SPICE netlisting, so the same schematic may be used for both layout and simulation.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com
- Raw text -