delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] new snapshots? |
From: | John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <50A6A265.6050300@neurotica.com> |
Date: | Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:43:51 -0700 |
Message-Id: | <4E8E6F31-EF8D-4540-BA86-7935C1C3E6D8@noqsi.com> |
References: | <50A688B8 DOT 4090809 AT neurotica DOT com> <CC923058-B962-45B5-973D-EA03906430B9 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A6A265 DOT 6050300 AT neurotica DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailer: | Apple Mail (2.1085) |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id qAGKhvnV012435 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Nov 16, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: >> >> Fast development pace indicates immaturity. > > It also indicates fast improvements. The object here was to convince a guy who had tried gschem and PCB a few years ago, and hated the user interface, to give it another try because it had gone through significant improvements since then. What, exactly, did he hate? To me, gschem is a power tool with few problems, while pcb is unusable. And the development effort on pcb isn't going into fixing the problems that make pcb unusable. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |