delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=texOkYU6oaZh+Dt3QemCb5PADDb/vYdtLBaSV/BueG0=; | |
b=qLmrKrS83ubzE42FUy0lzQizGNuEqt2ojCmob8zmNtP0STLrQYkVUY1PVtHTLtX0MG | |
RoF2qti0I1OlkBZkYMw9zb34QUu+h5rQshrfm3hg1DVuMCN+L6XDinp8ngG1gP1KFICR | |
MAC+hfXS8Z1zQCpJb/hjIM4RyWc4Z4wTV5j56CWM2xQLGF6guSQnFB/SO1jEDXGj7Bop | |
jdvCFKE/8qmuq3zlEloWYA0ePt0n/O/JbdlNVbOMxST20dP8P1X8TSneH1LV3rYS/K1U | |
O0uyEi03nU9s1/mndJMmo61edX82cGbcpk3WirbWHsLvBdKohpo8SfEhS/fQepuzBe7a | |
DtAg== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <50A3AAA6.1080704@laserlinc.com> |
References: | <CACPio-7O1OS0Z-NkOJmzTvxSFf+v9j6yFM8F6xRXeZvTjDUK8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<50A2B84F DOT 4080204 AT laserlinc DOT com> | |
<CACPio-4+wJj6WY-GsJhskmZicM1mn6YKoRc4kVVP9ABXLpZYYg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<50A3AAA6 DOT 1080704 AT laserlinc DOT com> | |
Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:14:10 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <CACPio-4cDVS+vmowijmZ6Y9E0+rXoEimc9ugZqTPGvOKQvoqow@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] slotting |
From: | Nathan Stewart <therealnathanstewart AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--e89a8f838e4987f55504ce75fc3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In the gui there is a checkbox for automatic slotting, (as well as override, and remove). By 'smaller chunks' I mean, selecting a small portion of the circuit at a time, such as a high side current monitor, or input buffers, etc... and renumbering just that section. After seeing the way they do complex schems at work, I've started splitting stuff out a lot more and using netnames/IO components to hook them up, and only join separate sections visibly when I need to draw attention to their interaction (such as one circuit loading another). I was unclear about slotting of broken out symbols, or where the 'slots' are not identical (such as where I was using slots to represent both sides of the optoisolator). Nate --e89a8f838e4987f55504ce75fc3a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In the gui there is a checkbox for automatic slotting, (as well as override= , and remove). By 'smaller chunks' I mean, selecting a small portio= n of the circuit at a time, such as a high side current monitor, or input b= uffers, etc... and renumbering just that section. After seeing the way they= do complex schems at work, I've started splitting stuff out a lot more= and using netnames/IO components to hook them up, and only join separate s= ections visibly when I need to draw attention to their interaction (such as= one circuit loading another). <br> <br>I was unclear about slotting of broken out symbols, or where the 's= lots' are not identical (such as where I was using slots to represent b= oth sides of the optoisolator). <br><br>Nate<br> --e89a8f838e4987f55504ce75fc3a--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |