delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=FP811sEMJO9zFtm4QM4KjUzcvMNRtSeokGBEbiavHh4=; | |
b=QoljO+Uh8j3WWilXj8ahkHgdOk0g1vleV+8fSqccJFTofs+A+mca455zABQQueMg15 | |
/yRRGlVsS7ugGI3YDVszkznhrOztsb+uy9NLqGozh1dzuoL6YFFzF00CnboeSCkLkCBB | |
JFDJ3XNPplJpKedJPDlOpblYuCPcRqJfhyU5/Js9VXgB8unpxsNlAGINHBQOO1HtXIau | |
0TdzJ9NqLLPcajSn7D4Q6v5N+IgK8cpTi00MEQ473GDqyfZp52trAT2rmp6C1b9A09oq | |
87fB7F/vXsblqxx2upmGlSwIuyu5HP/VLTCF0tnJBqZdw8aWSbasLquFGRRrcZdTfBS2 | |
JvtQ== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAC4O8c-xvCH8j2h3K3+ymO0Zgbru_JqDavqojY81iT_C=-zPrw@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<1511E63C-F435-44B1-9734-C7AF7AF49A92 AT sbcglobal DOT net> | |
<20121030132922 DOT GY32696 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> | |
<201210312340 DOT q9VNe3VW012697 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<CAC4O8c-xvCH8j2h3K3+ymO0Zgbru_JqDavqojY81iT_C=-zPrw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
Date: | Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:16:06 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <CAGde_xOu96b1jxN1n2km3_OAkX9umshs9FQF+Gdjgsbw_Mt4qQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: |
Pin hole size) | |
From: | Svenn Are Bjerkem <svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 2 November 2012 23:49, Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > But as fair warning let me give an example what I think: all the how-to-use-git > stuff from http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:scm should go away, as there are > a dozen web sites that cover that better. Maybe just the > 'how-to-not-scew-up-the-repository' could stay. You have had objections to this statement already, and I'll add mine, too. Leave the page as it is, and add links to the pages you think replace the contents of geda:scm. We can then look at them and judge before deciding what goes away and what stays. The page is not intended to teach git, just give devs and dev-wannabes enough to get a local repository. We also need to catch-up with some loose threads from remote forks and clones initialized by drive-by-devs. -- Svenn
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |