X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=u0g5VDPIJGfDvxYEq91KhCVwi/OZEIInRAJD26o993o=;
	b=MoUmt7dIfLzvcE18VzJio0FuB1H82Eoz2OEqyJMLbyiMQNNJ/hVFBBInsSdfnCLQOz
	8k3d/6WyQK6BCSFmSgtGY8soNDWK419foQxV6J4Y2S0ZOa6ztF6cgUcUyvxdJWOIh4uD
	9XuDJ19RvzElr9txYM/j7iWzxkYvu54514v19a8U7kFJ6CbV1gTms56UE62EnMfNDyZH
	q3jce6nqMGCY3EJ2E3Q1vX3ejUgSWF83G4FTXbtsnkszHTuo3lxCFbNK/5521a33JX+Y
	kdIi+e3DqqYyvdqxrDFIhFvyuTsXI/8pOuCxwkJfaIQDCEqKXf9vjXXtiuVQSLUuYkR3
	3n3A==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<HwV.JnH4.36n{7zfGcAr.1GacLE@seznam.cz>
References:	<HwV.JnH4.36n{7zfGcAr DOT 1GacLE AT seznam DOT cz>
Date:	Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:57:59 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQy=RD0CUmvo7e9Cns52EddN3OFVSzEiUEHw+rh9rFWtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Fwd: gaf improvement - moving of components
From:	Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

That issue is just an artifact of how you are drawing things. If you
redraw that schematic with a short length of vertical net going from
the horizontal one to each pin it will behave as you want when the
parts are moved. I always have the pin terminate the end of net line
to avoid this. I also do that because I visually dislike doing it the
other way.

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Vaclav Peroutka <vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> as in another thread there is discussion about gaf state, I have one idea to
> gaf improvement regarding movement of already connected components. I do not
> know how it is hard to implement it in the current gaf. But as first iteration
>  it can be enough if pin is taken as net with length of zero. And then this
> net is extended in the direction of movement.
>
> For example, the bottom left result can be done by moving R1 left, then down,
> then right. For me this is still simpler than to remove the net, move the
> component and then add the new net again.
>
> Second iteration is check if currently extending net does not overlay another
> item on the board ( component, net, text etc) and automatic splitting nets in
> the middle or near other items.
>
> What do you think about it ?
>
> Vaclav
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -