X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Objects of objects (was Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: Pin hole size))
In-reply-to:	<k6tvl2$ra5$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <2CB304B5-9587-4734-84E4-49F464744D11 AT noqsi DOT com> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de> <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de> <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <665E18E2-E9F9-40E4-9DE1-CC8FDBBDCB00 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8Q_MSCg6af5Ro13KefdTkMFeEWXyQLrMWZsTw+yJLA6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <EF4E82A7-A7C2-4FD9-B7C4-0EF7AEC54DA9 AT noqsi DOT com> <508EE43F DOT 5050505 AT neurotica DOT com> <9B14233C-F3A7-489C-BDC7-F6EAAAFCAB51 AT noqsi DOT com> <8835FFD4-C2F8-4EBF-BA06-2EFD38B47865 AT noqsi DOT com> <k6sebj$7q7$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20121101124136 DOT 247F28117B6F AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <k6tvl2$ra5$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Comments:	In-reply-to Kai-Martin Knaak <knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
	message dated "Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:06:26 +0100."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20121101143159.3AF688130EC0@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:31:58 +0100 (CET)
From:	karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Kai-Martin Knaak:
> Karl Hammar wrote:
...
> >> You can put symbols into symbols.
> > Yes, but last time I raised the issue (see thread starting at [1])
> > it was considered a bug.
> Well, this discussion also contains me explain, why it is a feature :-)

Well, I think we are on the same side in this...

> > And if you look at [2] it is specifically
> > forbidden. A first step would be to remove that ban.
> +1

Soo, how should one do that (I don't want to waste time on technical
solutions unless they have a chance to be accepted, and I don't want to
fork) ?

> >> Real recursion would involve symbols that contain themselves. This can
> >> only be meaningful if there is some kind of break condition. Infinite
> >> recursion works only in pure mathematics... Can you give an example of
> >> a use case where real recursion with a break condition would be
> >> useful?
> > 
> > No, not now, but I see no reason to outlaw it.
> 
> The break condition would need to be implemented. Until it is, you'd be 
> stuck in an endless loop.

There is always the hw limit. If people wants endless loops let them 
have it. You cannot outlaw stupidity, but forbiddning useful things 
because of stupidity is not nice to the nice guys.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57

- Raw text -