X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=qtexdnpegDY96yklVGUrMziVJI66SYvpsGHJtIDl59E=;
	b=hXbytvPLw/ipiTbw5gjiasWsIuNHgHXAkmP/37j5dI7DncU7zwQkcZgrazlFlAHCbV
	IjPU+s1St9ma5MAovb1W6IQ6mjwlIrM6emPycuoMBPMZ0kYqLVCGXSWmvnYPxbtzZFKT
	OeLKPNw+LiYBN/5+amkKDwg+INzRGRDQdMSeoQUlASFhC28mbxMmUMLFcc4tGwNU9YH2
	JVKptLCKwH7kVZf0vDT6Acto73yxWuAJ94jgwVhWeDws/dK+ED4BskAW4xAUaDYfvTUB
	VJJkwoY7yXtQ1oZdaYDVsPA10Bov15z59hyl0jRCgApaYzGj2pgI466JYu5Ab3kNKcO+
	T4zQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Originating-IP:	[50.72.201.196]
In-Reply-To:	<520BBE4F-11DA-4213-9AFF-F6F1127625C2@noqsi.com>
References:	<CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<2CB304B5-9587-4734-84E4-49F464744D11 AT noqsi DOT com> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <665E18E2-E9F9-40E4-9DE1-CC8FDBBDCB00 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8Q_MSCg6af5Ro13KefdTkMFeEWXyQLrMWZsTw+yJLA6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<EF4E82A7-A7C2-4FD9-B7C4-0EF7AEC54DA9 AT noqsi DOT com> <508EE43F DOT 5050505 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<9B14233C-F3A7-489C-BDC7-F6EAAAFCAB51 AT noqsi DOT com> <508EECDA DOT 8090803 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<20121030231609 DOT 615b3238 AT akka> <520BBE4F-11DA-4213-9AFF-F6F1127625C2 AT noqsi DOT com>
From:	Benjamin Bergman <ben AT benbergman DOT ca>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:39:34 -0500
Message-ID:	<CA+DWcQaZOFbC7GD2-TNARxUqPjrpHT+sMfyUUnkL+zSfjXDPnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
	Pin hole size)
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQl4XGw/KISX7bzWbV1sMjK2jCsV+DlfNES1I8vJQ8evlJ6wyWtYuyiqeup8EhGddChhCm07
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id qA13e8eE011594
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:32 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> I think this is related to the trouble I have understanding pcb. I expect a program like this to allow me to tell it "put a hole in this and that; put copper hither and yon". It shouldn't be necessary to implement "buried vias" in pcb: the user should be able to describe a buried via (or any other composite structure). Instead, pcb implements nothing but composites, and limits you to its built in set, whose members have properties difficult to understand.

This is probably the thing that has annoyed me the most with pcb too.
I feel that any layer should be like any other layer. The fact that
some things can only happen in certain layers, the silk layers are
combined in a non-intuitive way in the GUI, etc. is a substantial
barrier to entry.

I think pcb is a fantastic tool and I have used it to design a few
boards, but I think there is some unneeded complexity in the
interface. I don't know if there is currently any effort to correct
this, but I would be willing to lend a hand to do some of this
development. I haven't touched the code much, but if someone wants to
point me to a good starting place, I'm all ears.

Ben

- Raw text -