X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID:	<508EECDA.8090803@neurotica.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:53:46 -0400
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
	Pin hole size)
References:	<CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <2CB304B5-9587-4734-84E4-49F464744D11 AT noqsi DOT com> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de> <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de> <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <665E18E2-E9F9-40E4-9DE1-CC8FDBBDCB00 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8Q_MSCg6af5Ro13KefdTkMFeEWXyQLrMWZsTw+yJLA6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <EF4E82A7-A7C2-4FD9-B7C4-0EF7AEC54DA9 AT noqsi DOT com> <508EE43F DOT 5050505 AT neurotica DOT com> <9B14233C-F3A7-489C-BDC7-F6EAAAFCAB51 AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<9B14233C-F3A7-489C-BDC7-F6EAAAFCAB51@noqsi.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.4.5
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 10/29/2012 04:38 PM, John Doty wrote:
>>> I haven't found it difficult to get people to adopt gEDA. But no 
>>> layout person I work with is willing to use pcb.
>> 
>> What do these people use that they think is so much better?  I like
>> it just fine.
> 
> Osmond, Tango, Calay, PADS. One customer switched from Calay to PADS.
> For me, the change was a single word in a Makefile. What other tool
> or kit can do that?

  None.  gEDA is great stuff.

  Aren't all of those very expensive Windows-only packages?

>> Eight years ago it was a mess, but it's quite nice now.
> 
> To me, the conceptual mess remains. As I said, it's like driving
> through downtown Boston: it's all random special cases, no
> structure.

  I dunno.  The boards I make with it work just fine.  Why do I never
run into these limitations, when I use PCB very frequently, while you, a
person who just said they don't lay out their own boards, see all of
these horrible problems?

               -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -