delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on fly.srk.fer.hr |
X-Spam-Level: | |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-1.0 required=6.3 tests=ALL_TRUSTED |
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 | |
Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:41:52 +0100 |
From: | Ivan Stankovic <pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: |
Pin hole size) | |
Message-ID: | <20121029194152.GA3878@alpha2> |
References: | <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> |
<508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
<D04117DE-615E-412A-833E-4ED0F1B9A620 AT noqsi DOT com> | |
<5FF7010F-BB82-41F2-8EBC-608E91E045F1 AT noqsi DOT com> | |
<71Y DOT Jn6g DOT QcLTSHBZJi DOT 1GZPiP AT seznam DOT cz> | |
<k6kqok$l6s$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
<CF4CDFCF-EF69-4CE9-B211-52C4C166009E AT noqsi DOT com> | |
<508ECB94 DOT 2020006 AT neurotica DOT com> | |
<FE3CD6E7-15E6-44CE-A9F6-0F6ADBBAAE16 AT noqsi DOT com> | |
<508ED22E DOT 4010703 AT neurotica DOT com> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <508ED22E.4010703@neurotica.com> |
X-Operating-System: | GNU/Linux |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 02:59:58PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote: > At some point, complaining about potential badness becomes complaining > for the sake of complaining. We are dangerously close to that line here. I'd say that particular line was crossed some years ago. What we're seeing now is a natural consequence. > It's clear that we need more development in both packages. It's too > bad for all of us that the primary drivers of previous development have > gotten busy on other things...for years I've touted gEDA/PCB as being > two of the most actively-developed packages I've ever seen. That's not > the case anymore. This is just an unfortunate fact. The projects NEED > to have some time spent on them. Constant resistance to any potential > change, and no suggestions other than "scrap it and rewrite it all" are > doing nothing but putting a damper on things here. Absolutely agreed. > I could easily say a lot more, but I like and respect you, and I don't > want to sound like I'm attacking you. +1 -- Ivan Stankovic, pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |