X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID:	<508ECB94.2020006@neurotica.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:31:48 -0400
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
	Pin hole size)
References:	<20121028164801 DOT GA4859 AT alpha2> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de> <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de> <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de> <D04117DE-615E-412A-833E-4ED0F1B9A620 AT noqsi DOT com> <5FF7010F-BB82-41F2-8EBC-608E91E045F1 AT noqsi DOT com> <71Y DOT Jn6g DOT QcLTSHBZJi DOT 1GZPiP AT seznam DOT cz> <k6kqok$l6s$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CF4CDFCF-EF69-4CE9-B211-52C4C166009E AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CF4CDFCF-EF69-4CE9-B211-52C4C166009E@noqsi.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.4.5
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 10/29/2012 06:42 AM, John Doty wrote:
> 
> On Oct 28, 2012, at 8:47 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> 
>> John D. will be quick to point out other work-flows and that he 
>> actually uses some. These arguments tend to pop up time and again. I 
>> did a poll on geda-user some time ago. It was probably 2010 or 2009. 
>> You can look it up in the archive. (gmane archive, that is). 
>> Results were not very surprising: Almost everybody does gschem->pcb. 
>> Some also do some other work-flows. IIRC somebody even reported to 
>> start with pcb without bothering with gschem in the first place.
> 
> 1. Popularity doesn't measure power. TeX isn't popular, but it sure is powerful.

  I'd say TeX is pretty popular.  The drooling masses don't use it, but
who cares?

             -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -