X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=yy/HUUKoAmEhtsATa4V6HIpHn+QglAJ86vdEzJE4hho=;
	b=gjA25cKg+Y5huquOKsG1c1GsoQAU/2AkctDvV1WHpA5lyZOvSi3P9WHBuiH/Lm7ucp
	D85/uZ+Iyk9vx1Ls/pcto+oxiij/fB8UWevphGGvLQOoz+zPZ3UYz1kXPRKbTflOi6Ci
	WdzYAlBB42kARd0mXd6UGB5QoRakU5j2fXUs1bdQbsYbS1XCXMxbtC8Cz2qrfHbjKpll
	OYASC+2MXBtW5FGcQzjj3A3IMS191rbXB6SL333dP6X6eUxQ5+XgHLyAOJfsRhaSsaoW
	vo9vDm8ai1lAspqDJG00B7bZuzy4tg+xCRWl6ZPwRLbN1vWv5n8qAwv1b2eS6JMJD10c
	ffBw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<71Y.Jn6g.QcLTSHBZJi.1GZPiP@seznam.cz>
References:	<20121028164801 DOT GA4859 AT alpha2>
	<CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<D04117DE-615E-412A-833E-4ED0F1B9A620 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<5FF7010F-BB82-41F2-8EBC-608E91E045F1 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<71Y DOT Jn6g DOT QcLTSHBZJi DOT 1GZPiP AT seznam DOT cz>
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:56:17 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhR6j-cLc88a+-OOgDmYUQn03nizDAxmt5HW_docU_CarA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity,
	Was: Pin hole size)
From:	Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I regularly use gschem alone. At work I have a series of sound booths
from the 1960's. They needed their HVAC and electrical systems
updated. I drafted some symbols for the HVAC stuff. That reminds me I
should share that stuff. I have other examples of just using gschem
alone this was just my favorite.

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Vaclav Peroutka <vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz> wrote:
> Dear John,
>
>> I suggest that those who propose a change to gEDA consider whether the
> change would be beneficial if pcb did not exist.
>
> if there is no PCB in gEDA, probably nobody would use gschem alone. If you
> think that gschem has modern UI, even better. Then I suggest to start with
> development of the new PCB tool for gEDA. Maybe one can take PCB core and
> program new UI. Then, is GTK still ok for modern GUI these days ? What about
> wxWidgets ?
>
> What I want to say... Let's go with new and better PCB. My todo ideas are
> mainly related to PCB part of geda. The truth is, that my ideas are quite
> advanced, like moving routed objects... But still, if there is some way how to
>  have schem/pcb better, go for it. I will be the first who will support such
> changes.



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -