delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Oct 28, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Vaclav Peroutka wrote: > Dear John, > >> I suggest that those who propose a change to gEDA consider whether the > change would be beneficial if pcb did not exist. > > if there is no PCB in gEDA, probably nobody would use gschem alone. Hikyuu:Source jpd$ gnetlist -g help List of available backends: allegro bae bom bom2 calay cascade devel drc drc2 eagle futurenet2 geda gossip gsch2pcb liquidpcb mathematica maxascii osmond pads partslist-common partslist1 partslist2 partslist3 PCB pcbfwd pcbpins protelII redac spice-noqsi spice-sdb spice switcap systemc tango vams verilog vhdl vipec Look at all the things you can do with gschem's outputs that are not pcb! I do schematic design. My customers' layout people do not use pcb. Right now, my major design project is VLSI (under construction at https://github.com/noqsi/VideoASIC), which pcb *cannot* lay out. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |