X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=McPoGTtLPGujCKBrFsy6ye4RThT+VwtVHnd10rWsPF0=;
	b=x6nF6bQ+fZcICer0vG2YwrwC9kbu2ElmKGfD0qS6sAX/uBhwCxMlWUNfoQ5oDZdpvv
	gMShcppp6QMPzWcxJOkDqWrf8xuGzcC3eoG4egcPpA+CIGmAgNHCJbhNnD0R66Xv7Emt
	Ziuvqzb6zsElj6Vp0De5lkOuNTK4zXBxeOag27heYgAsq8e24qd4n5tQ222owGm4TalK
	cTjJLXr/GZJ7Cn2Rmtj4WaxkHMz9qeHIzlIb65MNmTypqOdh0HVA0xsrlEdZ8jQbKnnE
	2F2ZJjUB1kjvL1VjJLrPtg87C71AsQWeshT21RuO7b2CuVz1J3bb4YKvDeJP+NeWqeMD
	HaQA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20121028164801.GA4859@alpha2>
References:	<CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<D04117DE-615E-412A-833E-4ED0F1B9A620 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20121028164801 DOT GA4859 AT alpha2>
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:54:40 +0100
Message-ID:	<CAGde_xOc=_gYLcei7wmfnVOhbs_hYp-v-v4QPzT172dZAAkjDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
	Pin hole size)
From:	Svenn Are Bjerkem <svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 28 October 2012 17:48, Ivan Stankovic <pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr> wrote:
> Right. Big projects need flexibility that only gEDA can provide and the
> users are accustomed to its configuration. Since, as everyone knows, the
> best way to extend or configure gEDA is by using a C compiler, the fact
> that there are so many gEDA forks out there is a clear testament of the
> toolkit's adoption and strengths.

I am looking for those gEDA forks for my own interest. I found the
ones on github and Bernd Jendrissek's on repo.or.cz. In the forks I
have found so far, only Bernd's is diverging so much from the original
code base that it can really be called a fork. (Like when inkscape
forked from sodipodi and became what it is today.) The github stuff
seems more like feature branches where the best stuff get merged back.
If a fork changed name, to reflect its strive for individuality, I
have not yet found them, and would be happy to learn their location. I
think I am most interested in the parts up and until the end of
gnetlist, that is, all the stuff which lead to a netlist output.


-- 
Svenn

- Raw text -