delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <50897B77.1030401@laserlinc.com> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:48:39 -0400 |
From: | Joshua Lansford <Joshua DOT Lansford AT laserlinc DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: |
Pin hole size) | |
References: | <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50892DC8 DOT 6080308 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201210251629 DOT q9PGTfes029100 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <201210251629.q9PGTfes029100@envy.delorie.com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
On 10/25/2012 12:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > If you're going to put in all that effort, please put it into the main > wiki/repo. Why have two? > That would be fine. It would be nice to have an open place to document/log gEDA related items. Valuable material can be distilled out of it. Perhaps a separate wiki. Folks could post about patches which are not universally applicable. It could be a place to catch scripts. Peer evaluation could highlight useful scripts and correct their documentation. More people may consider themselves noobs to this forum then not and probably be more comfortable sharing their work and corrections this way. I suppose that is 4 cents now. I'm almost all the way to a nickle.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |