X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=OA+PxIfLsWv4b9jgtcPbl2t9y3mQNhMhtv0DMzoGUVU=;
	b=RiMVPQOUg1r9su5+GQ4m9/MaWV6C57Uesld7O9LCgb7V5RGfGKOtal5swqjp3rEYoL
	QBwLvE7bsqR9S2nJQn4QotdMtcfRAmqxA0m+pUz8UPnubthzAvcCSBgwk70zHt6bQEGI
	QrRAmnF6P05eSH/KP9t4krzKu7NMUT/2Oikz5Yq+Dv2/ZDWAgZQmdTbTtTyYKlcKKLUS
	TcDk7GRC1GX6Q0eF6McJozYIdIT60jRI12FIUMDLsCFtkVO6eSwLzciDLFcgw9REwQ7+
	8mML2k1r4b/XWVxFVuVQqEHpRMFrNKgkAwKd7LxF7mG4B/PIAp2tezrjtAuGSU4TPIdc
	XhBw==
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:03:58 +0400
From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Text scaling during zoom in gschem
Message-ID:	<20121024160357.GA26151@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<507b8d7c DOT 8ad3440a DOT 7926 DOT ffff8637 AT mx DOT google DOT com>
	<20121015092411 DOT 4eca1f3f AT svelte>
	<20121015171327 DOT GA25788 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<1350343173 DOT 2413 DOT 29 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	<CAMvDHVBWGCQazZ3=SzkyboRmMTU+d_6kv3WuSw3pqmnwKZCMww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<k5l5tc$61q$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20121017170502 DOT GA6695 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<k679kq$s1g$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<k679kq$s1g$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:35:55AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
> 
> > 2) gschem uses Arial for displaying.
> 
> I looked it up in the source. And indeed, it does:
> /-----------------
> geda-gaf$ grep Arial * -R
> (...)
> gschem/src/o_text.c:# define FONT_NAME "Arial"
> Binary file gschem/src/gschem-o_text.o matches
> \-----------------
> 
> What is the reasoning for this choice? Maybe a historic relic?

I had already provided you with two links about it. I could send you the
copy of the html, if you want.

> Anyway, these days, there is no shortage of quality fonts which are 
> free as in freedom. How about Nimbus-Sans? The relevant portion of 
> this popular font family has been released under GPL. In addition it 
> is said to feature almost the same metrics as arial.
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimbus_Sans )

On my Debian system Nimbus fonts are always used instead of Arial by
default if I have no MS fonts installed.

> 
> > 5) If gschem has any problems with some Liberation font and has no
> > problems with the original MS fonts then the Liberation fonts are
> > guilty because they claim metric compatibility.
> 
> Not necessarily.
> Many years back in time, there was a similar case with EPS files 
> created by Microsoft applications. Ghostscript got stuck on these 
> files while many other applcations were fine. Still, the bug was not 
> in ghostscript but in the microsoft files.

If you change here:
  Microsoft -> Liberation
  ghostscript -> gschem
then you repeat my conclusion ;)

-- 
http://vzhbanov.byethost33.com

- Raw text -