X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=ZDk+SgjG6CJ10rNw4f2wC+/7cIuHcXfSrwdTnsijY3g=;
	b=uagJSJQOVzQKRDbTMXe0onw/TAkvTMdcVn11vgZ/2hHwaMX5vmHyKUSt21FknOIzzK
	XXPkKbQk1MCWb/Ff7PSytP6QRtU3Kgueev7XqIceHqpQCYnkvVFVUbV7XQ9SqaF+L9WH
	vStyIJDHPfYWYD62KXqxqFJgP2y+nxIlzyz9xmG2P8HdnTHqlsIUoGJQB+YvZDpbDKhn
	019+7HXK5rxxjPdyHrJnafzaKqwnvYvy7de3PhLMt8MqwO9Aia0vOE29zgqQs9ZnSXED
	emZBIGmB428YqvA6DcBduTlMkXFi+AbiL/ctbzrVzUcs8tzn5W6tuWS5t5FCey8JCZ64
	IsiA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<k0vvon$pvi$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<k0vvon$pvi$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:18:07 -0400
Message-ID:	<CACPio-49=gQ+1U00ETu8UL+7-X0v-BeJrRvDpM+Kw63=RCgOaA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gschem takes a nap
From:	Nathan Stewart <therealnathanstewart AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Yep - seen it - just enough to begin to suspect gschem rather than my
system. (Quite often I'm using gschem on my desktop over X/WiFi to my
laptop, which itself is occasionally prone to such hiccups. IOW - too
many hiccup prone links to point fingers at gschem immediately, but I
have seen it on git built gschem using it locally on my desktop.) I
Will keep an eye out for operations that trigger now that I know I'm
not just having an ADHD moment.  I don't see it as much using gschem
locally on my laptop which has 1.6.2.20110115.

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
<knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
> My gschem compiled from git a few weeks ago, sometimes gets unresponsive
> for a few seconds. During this time, it takes the load of one of my
> processors cores to 100%. GUI commands given with the mouse are stored
> silently and get execued when the application returns. Afterwards, I can
> go on working as usual. This seems to happen about tree times per
> afternoon.
>
> Anyone else seen this?
>
> ---<)kaimartin(>---
>

- Raw text -