X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20120814174853.4373.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:48:53 +0200
From:	Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] silk layer names
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20120813012700 DOT 2106039c AT akka> <k0d64k$ett$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<k0d64k$ett$1@dough.gmane.org>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> See attached an obvious expansion of the patch mentioned above. It makes the 
> GUI show the actual name of the currently active silk layer rather than a 
> hard coded string "silk".
> 
> If both patches are applied, the text of the silk layer button in the GUI 
> toggles between "top silk" and "bottom silk" when the view is changed with 
> the tab key. This makes it more obvious, which of the two silk layers is 
> currently active.

All right. And thanks for the layer name comment in the other mail.
I'm obviously not completely up to date with the code. :)


> +++ b/src/hid/gtk/gui-top-window.c
..
> @@ -487,7 +487,10 @@ layer_process (gchar **color_string, char **text, int *set, int i)
>      {
>      case LAYER_BUTTON_SILK:
>        *color_string = Settings.ElementColor;
> -      *text = _( "silk");
> +      if (Settings.ShowSolderSide)
> +         *text = (char *)UNKNOWN (PCB->Data->Layer[solder_silk_layer].Name);
> +      else
> +         *text = (char *)UNKNOWN (PCB->Data->Layer[component_silk_layer].Name);

How about:

  *text = (char *)UNKNOWN (PCB->Data->Layer[Settings.ShowSolderSide ? solder_silk_layer : component_silk_layer].Name);


The if looks not great.

And those identifiers are way too long in my taste. :)


//Peter

- Raw text -