delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:06:26 +0200 |
From: | Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] parts of a device to different (schematic) |
subsheets | |
Message-ID: | <20120805190626.5605a071@akka> |
In-Reply-To: | <AF96E5FB-3AF4-4540-B7EA-7082458904DD@noqsi.com> |
References: | <20120804132146 DOT 662918283EED AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> |
<20DFF748-1669-4718-8E52-A3EF480087F4 AT gmail DOT com> | |
<20120805134222 DOT 1fe89dca AT akka> | |
<AF96E5FB-3AF4-4540-B7EA-7082458904DD AT noqsi DOT com> | |
X-Mailer: | Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Provags-ID: | V02:K0:nn/JGMAbg7zaWnQPguaBpzwfuf1zQygRgDRI+UdDBHc |
wgO1F83WyFVxDDJgMb/u2LZQB0gz0cBq3/BJSrWzIWm162Zahc | |
Ab6rjidew6kbKJC3AZT4Ot5R+N6CLHZ57pzCqtxpbNTqfIL/Wx | |
PmfbjF3Pe/HEL4pmD6sJvJXzuur6YhuUxX4NkIWYGsvsbcYx7U | |
2kGq4jzZH8TH4pmdWy5eBoUGjY7o+BCjPIFWG/dicyfrBNMpkr | |
AmQdMfUrdsblvmOyM6Cuto//XUeUFlT3povUySjUDVOQ/OdT/l | |
pGyDzyg36m51ZAZ0RWnJCpC/F8Hy2vqFXWma2gBg5aWtquhhQ= | |
= | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--Sig_/mEgcw_+LNpD+UIsJYftC9Au Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> schrieb am 5. August 2012: > Depends on which gnetlist version you're using. Unless stated otherwise, I always talk about current git head versions ;-) > 1.6 users will find > that unless you have identical footprints for all instances, it's a > bit difficult to predict what you'll get. Even worse: If some of the parts do not contain a footprint attribute, the component may fail to put it in the netlist at all. Specifically, gnetlist always chose the symbol in the file to determine the footprint. Order in the file depends on the order the symbols were entered. This was one of the long standing bugs, that were finally dealt with about a year ago. Now, gnetlist checks for conflicting values of attributes and issues warnings. Unfortunately, like I wrtoe before, gnetlist currently regards an absent footprint attribute as conflicting with an existing footprint attribute value. The more general problem of output depending on the order of GUI input also remains to be dealt with. ---<)kaimartin(>--- --=20 Kai-Martin Knaak --Sig_/mEgcw_+LNpD+UIsJYftC9Au Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAeqBIACgkQt9RkiGwLn1OduACgiJgulHU8lBF2VLbJrh8i0c8W rrAAnRXSrBGnkbI9jBPaGHMqU1x3RuJX =j5l5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mEgcw_+LNpD+UIsJYftC9Au--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |