X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:35:36 +0200
From:	Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Symbol attributes
Message-ID:	<20120725063536.GA24867@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<50084839 DOT 9080804 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<201207191830 DOT q6JIUH0o028413 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<juj1ab$sg2$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
	<500DB5AB DOT 4000903 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<jun5p4$o11$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
	<500F4824 DOT 1080905 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<500F4824.1080905@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SPF-Received:	2
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Ham
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:13:08PM -0700, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
> Kai,
> Thanks for your response to my thread.  See my responses below.
> 
> Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> >If I want to attach some text that can be edited in the schametic
> >but does not have a special meaning for any other tool, I
> >introduce a visible symbol "component-label=".
> >
> That is just about what I am doing now, but I am calling it
> "symname=", for Symbolic Name.

Whichever you use doesn't matter, however I like to have "label"
in the name to indicate that it is merely designed to be displayed
and not used for any other purpose.

The most annoying issue is that, being an attribute, it is displayed
in a different color than the text associated with symbols which played
a similar role in the standard library. I don't think it is right now
possible to modify the colour depending on regexp matching on the attribute
name; otherwise it would be nice if attribute name matching ".*label.*"
would use text color (automatically atattribute promotion time).   

> >Do you find gsymcheck actually useful? 

No.

	Regards,
	Gabriel

- Raw text -