delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2012 01:04:29 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201207170504.q6H54TP3009214@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <ju20mg$a6i$1@dough.gmane.org> (message from Kai-Martin Knaak on |
Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:22:24 +0200) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gedasymbols going git? |
References: | <ju20mg$a6i$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Personally, I don't like git, for various reasons, so don't expect too much from me. I used CVS because it was already set up on my server and I didn't need to do much to make gedasymbols use it. However, if someone comes up with a plan for a new gedasymbols, and is willing and able to make it work, perhaps now would be an opportunity to move gedasymbols to the geda-project server? The key factors are: * users can only edit their own files, but admins can edit any file * automatically becomes a web page, including automatic symbol, footprint, and CSV to image/table/whatever * it must be easy to add and manage users. There are a lot more gedasymbols users than geda developers. This does not include users being able to "register" without an admin's approval. * it is currently mirrored to a second server for redundancy
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |