delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailer: | exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3 |
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: | repl |
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: | inbox |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] One big vs. a few smaller sym's for MCU's (was: Yet another sym file generator) |
In-reply-to: | <87pq83a5rj.fsf@gag.com> |
References: | <20120709210244 DOT 60387819FB92 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87liisbbr8 DOT fsf AT gag DOT com> <20120710134503 DOT A63E2819FBA0 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87pq83a5rj DOT fsf AT gag DOT com> |
Comments: | In-reply-to Bdale Garbee <bdale AT gag DOT com> |
message dated "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:24:32 -0600." | |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Message-Id: | <20120711201733.A35D7819FBAB@turkos.aspodata.se> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:17:32 +0200 (CEST) |
From: | karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar) |
X-Virus-Scanned: | ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Bdale: > For me, since I'm designing things that are small enough that I can > typically get the entire schematic on one sheet, there's not a lot of > value in breaking up the symbol. I found that is so for me too. > Once you're past 100 pins or so on the device, breaking them up by > function so that you can have for example a page in the schematic that's > about the power supply, one that's about external memory interfaces, one > that's about network interfacing, etc etc etc, that can seem quite > useful... and make it worth the slightly larger effort of creating and > maintaining a set of symbols. I'm trying to find ways to minimize that effort by keeping a pin list and the tell the program what parts of it should go to resp. (sub-) symbol. Assuming there is no pain in creating and maintaining that set of symbols, what pain is left ? Perhaps one should some way to check that a subpart isn't included twice and such. > That's my take on it, at least. Ok, thanks. Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |