delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gerber export - outline layer |
From: | Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <201207101614.q6AGEu2L008714@envy.delorie.com> |
References: | |
<CACPio-4fO1Cku2=kT5jsRATZ68+HSvpXGHQsLjhzuix+msBivw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20120710062222 DOT 34c58d67 AT svelte> | |
<201207101614 DOT q6AGEu2L008714 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
Date: | Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:35:48 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <1341938148.2526.3.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Evolution 2.32.3 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 12:14 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Let's all pretend that these concepts are called "layers" and > > "sublayers" to make it clear which is the fundamental one. > > The lexicon refers to them as "drawing layers" and "physical layers". > > That we have a hack for "outline" doesn't mean we should change the > whole design philosophy. We should just fix the hack. Is the special meaning of the "outline" layer documented in the pcb manual? I can remember discussions of this topic on this list, but not in the manual.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |