Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/07/10/09:45:10
Bdale Garbee:
> Karl Hammar <karl AT aspodata DOT se> writes:
...
> > So I wanted a few sym files for this device, e.g. one with
> > . all pins
> > . only the power pins
> > . jtag, osc*, boot* pins
> > . adc and dac pins
> > etc.
> I tried living that way for a while, but gave up and am back to using a
> single symbol, manually created.
...
What is the pro's and con's for having on the one side
A, one big sym with all the pins
and on the other hand
B, multiple small(er) sym's, e.g. one for each function
///
My guesses are:
Pro A:
just one (1) sym to care for
Con A:
with bigger packages, the nets is going to look like spagetti
with lots of net lines, the symbol outlines tend to be hard to
spot in a B/W printout
Pro B:
one sym one function one (paper) page, easy to check
Con B:
have I covered all functions?
have I duplicate pins, connected to more than one net
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
- Raw text -