delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:45:35 -0700 |
From: | Andrew Poelstra <asp11 AT sfu DOT ca> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] [PATCH] Allow to create metric Gerber and drill |
files, hopefully final version. | |
Message-ID: | <20120709234535.GD23449@malakian.lan> |
References: | <20120703140236 DOT GA12646 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> |
<CAKakQcdTgG6E2h+UgWoh-ujP6vFDH=voY-PBJR3OFG2awqL0_A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20120705101614 DOT GA19974 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> | |
<20120706202633 DOT GA28355 AT malakian DOT lan> | |
<20120706213340 DOT GA30622 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> | |
<20120707104156 DOT 17641 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
<20120708042719 DOT GE1637 AT malakian DOT lan> | |
<20120709224559 DOT GB4355 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20120709224559.GB4355@visitor2.iram.es> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from 8bit to quoted-printable by pobox.sfu.ca id q69NpmVj019283 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q69NpvqS012773 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:45:59AM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > Thanks for pointing this out, I completely missed it, but I think > that they point to the wrong 0 when looking at the source. > Oh, good catch! > Corrected in the following, with a fix for octogonal apertures > in which I did a mistake and ended up with two metric conversion > specifications. Note that I have touched a bit the whitespace at > the beginning of the comments so that they start with a tab like > the surrounding code lines. > Can you elaborate on this a bit? Specifically, do we need a new test case to check on this (since our existing ones apparently did not catch the bug)? > > The fact that imperial Gerber have 2 orders or magnitude better > resolution than the associated drill is a problem (25.4µm versus > 0.254µm). At least metric gives micrometer resolution for both. > Is this a problem with the spec, or our implementation? -- Andrew Poelstra Email: asp11 at sfu.ca OR apoelstra at wpsoftware.net Web: http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew "You shouldn't trust every quote you read on the Internet." -- Socrates
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |