X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:41:54 -0700
From:	Colin D Bennett <colin AT gibibit DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: Dual SPI Flash adapter attempt 2.0
Message-ID:	<20120427064154.44e9eb77@svelte>
In-Reply-To:	<4F9A6010.7010305@schinagl.nl>
References:	<4F915B7C DOT 9000009 AT schinagl DOT nl>
	<4F959E1F DOT 6010803 AT schinagl DOT nl>
	<4F997E2E DOT 7010306 AT schinagl DOT nl>
	<4F99CEFD DOT 10707 AT schinagl DOT nl>
	<jncl8u$ph5$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20120426170536 DOT 73e21755 AT svelte>
	<4F9A6010 DOT 7010305 AT schinagl DOT nl>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - gator297.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - gibibit.com
X-BWhitelist:	no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender:	c-67-160-113-82.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (svelte) [67.160.113.82]:34537
X-Source-Auth:	colin AT gibibit DOT com
X-Email-Count:	1
X-Source-Cap:	c2t5bGVuO3NreWxlbjtnYXRvcjI5Ny5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:00:00 +0200
Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list AT schinagl DOT nl> wrote:

> On 04/27/12 02:05, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 01:20:51 +0200
> > Kai-Martin Knaak<kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>  wrote:
> >
> >> Oliver Schinagl wrote:
> >>> So the big question is; shall I send this to seeed for
> >>> fabrication
> >>
> >> The outline lines should look more simple. The gerbers
> >> expicitely call for a milled edge at the middle of each line.
> >> So ther should be a single line where you expect the fab to
> >> cut the board.
> >>
> >> The fabs I know, would object against such a multiple part
> >> layout and charge extra for their increased handling effort.
> >> They prefer layouts in one piece.
> >
> > You could save yourself the effort of panelization and get
> > inexpensive but high-quality boards from Laen's PCB order
> > <http://pcb.laen.org>, it's USD$5.00/in^2 for 3 copies (i.e.,
> > $1.66/in^2 cost); International mailing is a flat rate of $15
> > for USPS Priority Mail, or $5 for standard first class.  Laen
> > has no minimum size and no extra cost if you send him several
> > small layouts -- he will panelize them.
> Speaking purely out of cost, Seeed is much much cheaper, even if
> I have to cut the panels myself and even assuming I can't cut as
> narrow as I'd hope and mess up some pcb's.
> 
> Seeed charges 9.99 USD for 10x 5cmx5cm. So that's 50 cm^2 for
> 9.99. That's 80 of those mini pcb's. Even if I break 50% from not
> being able to cut properly, I still have 40 PCB's for 9.99 with
> free shipping (I think, but even so).

I didn't realize you were making quite a few boards.

Wow, that is cheap.  That comes out to only US$0.26/in^2.
How is the quality?  I might use that for larger boards or bigger
runs if it is decent.

Regards,
Colin

- Raw text -