X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 23:57:10 +0200
From:	Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 0805 resistor networks
Message-ID:	<20120406215710.GA15630@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1204022358160 DOT 27947 AT zaphod DOT 661 DOT org>
	<4F7AB359 DOT 1000001 AT optonline DOT net>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1204030124230 DOT 30369 AT zaphod DOT 661 DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1204030124230.30369@zaphod.661.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SPF-Received:	2
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Ham
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:34:28AM -0700, David Griffith wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, gene glick wrote:
> 
> >On 04/03/2012 02:59 AM, David Griffith wrote:
> >>
> >>Before I go out and make my own, would anyone here happen to have
> >>footprints for 0805-sized surface mount resistor networks? I don't see
> >>any on gedasymbols.org.
> >>
> >I've got a schematic symbol and pcb footprint for Bourns part
> >number CAY10-330J4LF:
> >
> >http://www.bourns.com/data/global/pdfs/CAY10.pdf
> >
> >It is an 8-pin, 4 resistor network. It's very small, not sure if
> >it is 0805 or not. Also the footprint isn't vetted yet - but I
> >think it is okay to use. If you want it, let me know.
> 
> Yes, I'd like to see that.  What are the practical differences
> between convex and concave terminals?  Are the footprints
> effectively the same?

I can't remember, but if I remember correctly, in the end 
I selected concave ones in a board I did in 2005 or so.
These were four resistors in a 1206 footprint.

	Regards,
	Gabriel (back after 1 week off the 'net)

- Raw text -