delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=Bc34/FZ/BilJXdf21gU6sq+wku4qUVbpCtYDjSOcwZM=; | |
b=cAcJZLmYA85R3JwI0wqbhQNRR9l5TEr1crSzNnGh+FO65tymurEWsdl0STPnOkANXl | |
gty9gbEfGlV5oFJsfAPOSrbYM9lM72cZaLkcnNQnQEE0C5iRjQzg+PSbpkXb9pNdV6p+ | |
t+S24W4LUoQ0BSeBGzBE+4MllcdOUUex2gcUiO7vNdJFM4JHJEWUU6MTj2XyBFG6FBSi | |
fKoiACy3JpIw/ueIQOWdFMo9P0Ny2vzM76+weMR0t6yCcMwTS9u99FR/3L/o14+m2cnT | |
sGB8hO8zBh4AZFGNK+Kv/3mXZvmrp+AKHe7rM4Zqza2SE2GbFrK/xD3y3lPnWbvoLYiE | |
XlLQ== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20120323165830.7e72da02@svelte> |
References: | <20120323153154 DOT 31f9090d AT svelte> |
<201203232307 DOT q2NN7qL4011010 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<20120323165830 DOT 7e72da02 AT svelte> | |
Date: | Sat, 24 Mar 2012 06:50:19 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <CAPYb0EFAGpee1W0qu8F65sp9CcXW52n=wAh+Ni5d9tMObXc+dQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Solder paste/nopaste flag overlapping, and custom |
paste apertures | |
From: | Bob Paddock <bob DOT paddock AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I read an article somewhere that described a modification of this > where the QFN exposed pad is actually segmented by solder mask as > well as the paste stencil -- this keeps the solder evenly > distributed even if the chip tries to tilt a bit. It is only the stencil for the paste that should be segmented, to control the amount of the paste. The mask and pad should not be segmented.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |