delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] use-license: unlimited, dist-license: GPL |
From: | Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <4F6A36A5.10807@laserlinc.com> |
References: | <4F6A36A5 DOT 10807 AT laserlinc DOT com> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:18:15 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <1332364695.2535.18.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Evolution 2.32.3 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 16:14 -0400, Joshua Lansford wrote: > Hi, > I know this is probably hashed over and over, but I have done a fair > bit of searching before asking. I am developing schematics which can't > become GPL. I was going to ask a very related question some months ago, based on a discussion in a german forum... Someone said that he can not use free tools like gEDA/KiCAD because he can not check the licenses of every symbol and footprint to be compatible with his commercial EDA product. So, should we group symbols and footprints in free, GPL, ... to make commercial use easier?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |