delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:25:23 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201203201625.q2KGPNAV008105@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <1332246519.2657.14.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> (message from Stefan |
Salewski on Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:28:39 +0100) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Pollution of gedasymbols |
References: | <1332246519 DOT 2657 DOT 14 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Is it really a good idea to put ALL your symbols and footprints to > gedasymbols, resulting in names like The gedasymbols policy is intentionally unrestrictive in order to get the most community involvement. It's up to the users to decide which users provide the best content, I'm not going to police it.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |